The agent keeps watch
An autonomous AI research agent revisits official terms, help centres, announcements and verified public channels on a recurring schedule.
Scoring methodology
An autonomous research agent keeps the evidence under observation. Reviewed terms become comparable facts, those facts become seven category ratings, and a ranking lens decides their emphasis.
01 · A living evidence system
This is not a static card directory. The catalogue runs on a synchronized evidence system that connects source monitoring, change detection, review and publication without letting an automated observation silently become a public financial claim.
An autonomous AI research agent revisits official terms, help centres, announcements and verified public channels on a recurring schedule.
New observations are matched to a shared structured layer of sources, facts and card profiles. Complete exact matches can confirm freshness; meaningful differences preserve what changed.
The agent can discover, compare and prepare an update, but reviewed facts remain the only input allowed to change public claims, scores and rankings.
One useful stream
Product launches, availability changes and special offers can begin as signals found by the agent. After review, useful items enter one feed with News and Offers filters; offers also remain available in the dedicated offer explorer. Publication in either place never raises a card's score.
02 · Comparable facts
Provider claims are kept, then broken into the values that can be compared across cards. A missing value stays unknown; it never becomes zero cost, full availability or a supported feature.
We separate the $0 card price from mandatory delivery and score the total cost to obtain it.
The entry rate, cap, tier cost and conditions are separated.
Deposit and outbound routes, networks, fees and limits are checked independently.
Internal transfers, bank payouts and on-chain sends are checked separately; only the verified route is treated as instant.
03 · The card itself
The recurring and transaction costs that determine what the card is likely to cost in practice.
Included in this rating
Practical entry-tier purchase rewards, with only limited risk-adjusted credit for separate Earn / Yield utility.
Included in this rating
How broadly and conveniently the card can be used for everyday payments and cash access.
Included in this rating
How money can enter and leave the account through approved routes, including the practical quality of each route.
Included in this rating
Where the product is offered and how clearly signup and KYC requirements are defined.
Included in this rating
The structured custody boundary, CEX dependency and whether the user controls funds until payment.
Included in this rating
The legal and operational stack behind the card, including whether each named role applies.
Included in this rating
Worked example
A true statement, but only one part of the cost.
Ownership, transaction, cash-access and transfer costs contribute to Cost efficiency.
An unconfirmed transfer fee is not treated as zero.
04 · Rating & scenarios
The balanced baseline used for the main card rating and the default Top cards order.
05 · Filtering & ranking
06 · A common question
The direction of cause is the reverse. We rank cards from reviewed product facts first. Only then do we prioritize outreach and special-offer work for cards that already rank near the top. That is why offers are concentrated among higher-ranked cards: the ranking guides where we seek an offer; an offer does not lift the ranking.
Bleap Card is a useful counterexample. It ranks near the top, but has no public offer on this site. Bleap's consumer referral links are personal and cannot be used for commercial referral activity without express permission, so we do not publish one. This does not change Bleap's score or position.
Use the model