
MetaMaskMetaMask
76
Side-by-side card comparison
MetaMask Card has the higher Overall Score by 12 points (76 vs 64). MetaMask Card looks stronger for Cashback, Travel, Funds control, and Lowest fees, while Decaf Card comes out ahead for Transfers.
Fees & features
Best markers compare published, comparable values. Unknown values never win a row.
MetaMask CardOverall76
Decaf CardOverall64Choosing between these cards
For FX on foreign-currency purchases, MetaMask lists 0–1%, versus 1–2% at Decaf. Use the tariff for your country and plan; conversion fees can add to these figures.
MetaMask: Spending supported wallet tokens without preloading a card balance. Decaf: Spending USDC received on Solana or Stellar through a separate card load.
Common questions
MetaMask Card has the higher Overall Score (76 vs 64). That does not make it better for everyone: your preferred fees, rewards, way of holding funds and country availability can change the practical choice.
MetaMask Card has the lower published FX fee (0–1% vs 1–2%). Compare plan, FX, card-spend, top-up and ATM charges separately because one fee does not represent the full cost.
The providers have not published enough matching base cashback information to name a winner. Check the maximum rates, reward assets, caps and conditions below. Maximum rates may depend on tiers, caps, categories or other conditions, so the entry rate and reward asset matter too.
MetaMask Card uses a self-controlled wallet setup, while Decaf Card uses a non-custodial account setup. Neither approach is always better, so choose the level of control you are comfortable with.
The latest information check for these two cards was October 19, 2026, using 33 official sources in total. Each full card review lists its own check date, sources and anything the provider has not clearly disclosed.