
MetaMaskMetaMask
76
Side-by-side card comparison
MetaMask Card has the higher Overall Score by 7 points (76 vs 69). MetaMask Card looks stronger for Cashback, Travel, Lowest fees, and Transfers, while Rebind Card comes out ahead for Funds control.
Fees & features
Best markers compare published, comparable values. Unknown values never win a row.
MetaMask CardOverall76
Rebind CardOverall69Choosing between these cards
For FX on foreign-currency purchases, MetaMask lists 0–1%, versus No added Gnosis FX fee; Visa rate applies at Rebind. Use the tariff for your country and plan; conversion fees can add to these figures.
MetaMask offers a physical card, while Rebind does not. For purchases that require the card itself rather than a phone wallet, consider MetaMask and check its order and delivery terms.
Common questions
MetaMask Card has the higher Overall Score (76 vs 69). That does not make it better for everyone: your preferred fees, rewards, way of holding funds and country availability can change the practical choice.
Rebind Card has the lower published FX fee (No added Gnosis FX fee; Visa rate applies vs 0–1%). Compare plan, FX, card-spend, top-up and ATM charges separately because one fee does not represent the full cost.
The providers have not published enough matching base cashback information to name a winner. Check the maximum rates, reward assets, caps and conditions below. Maximum rates may depend on tiers, caps, categories or other conditions, so the entry rate and reward asset matter too.
MetaMask Card uses a self-controlled wallet setup, while Rebind Card uses a non-custodial account setup. Neither approach is always better, so choose the level of control you are comfortable with.
The latest information check for these two cards was October 20, 2026, using 47 official sources in total. Each full card review lists its own check date, sources and anything the provider has not clearly disclosed.