
1inch1inch
79
Side-by-side card comparison
1inch Card has the higher Overall Score by 7 points (79 vs 72). 1inch Card looks stronger for Travel, Funds control, and Transfers, while MEXC Global Card comes out ahead for Cashback and Lowest fees.
01 · Overall score versus use-case fit
1inch Card has the higher Overall Score in this comparison. MEXC Global Card may be the better fit for Cashback and Lowest fees. A score cannot tell you whether a provider will accept your application or whether every feature will be available where you live, so check the latest provider terms before signing up.

1inch Card comes out ahead for Travel, Funds control, and Transfers in this comparison. It is worth a closer look if those are the parts of a card you expect to use most.

MEXC Global Card comes out ahead for Cashback and Lowest fees in this comparison. It is worth a closer look if those are the parts of a card you expect to use most.
The overall leader does not win every use case, so the reason you want the card matters here.
1inch Card has the higher Overall Score by 7 points.
The starting plan and FX figures are tied, or the providers have not published enough matching information to name a lower-cost option.
MEXC Global Card has the higher published base cashback rate (4% vs 1%).
1inch Card uses a hybrid custody setup, while MEXC Global Card uses a custodial balance setup. Neither approach is always better, so choose the level of control you are comfortable with.
1inch Card lists more card formats and phone-wallet options (4 vs 3).
MEXC Global Card lists more stablecoins and ways to send money out (5 vs 3).
02 · Read the shortlist
Start with the strengths that drive each use-case result, then test them against costs and access.
Partner links may earn us a commission. Read our affiliate disclosure for how these links work.
03 · Compare the details
Comparable figures receive a marker; missing or unverified details stay visible instead of becoming an assumed advantage.
1inch CardOverall79
MEXC Global CardOverall7204 · The trade-off
1inch Card finishes ahead with an Overall Score of 79 versus 72 for MEXC Global Card. The starting plan and FX figures are tied, or the providers have not published enough matching information to name a lower-cost option. MEXC Global Card has the higher published base cashback rate (4% vs 1%).
MEXC Global Card still comes out ahead for Cashback and Lowest fees, which may matter more than the overall result if that is how you plan to use the card. 1inch Card uses a hybrid custody setup, while MEXC Global Card uses a custodial balance setup. Neither approach is always better, so choose the level of control you are comfortable with.
MEXC Global Card lists more stablecoins and ways to send money out (5 vs 3). Before applying, confirm availability in your country and recheck the provider's current fees and reward conditions.
If one card now looks like the better fit, you can check the latest application terms on the provider site or read our full 1inch Card and MEXC Global Card reviews first.


05 · Common questions
1inch Card has the higher Overall Score (79 vs 72). That does not make it better for everyone: your preferred fees, rewards, way of holding funds and country availability can change the practical choice.
The starting plan and FX figures are tied, or the providers have not published enough matching information to name a lower-cost option. Compare plan, FX, card-spend, top-up and ATM charges separately because one fee does not represent the full cost.
MEXC Global Card has the higher published base cashback rate (4% vs 1%). Maximum rates may depend on tiers, caps, categories or other conditions, so the entry rate and reward asset matter too.
1inch Card uses a hybrid custody setup, while MEXC Global Card uses a custodial balance setup. Neither approach is always better, so choose the level of control you are comfortable with.
The latest information check for these two cards was October 3, 2026, using 34 official sources in total. Each full card review lists its own check date, sources and anything the provider has not clearly disclosed.